Compare Financial Products Side by Side

Pick up to three listings from the directory, then weigh them against each other on the attributes that decide the choice — fees, minimums, features, regulation and ratings.

Add listings to compare

2 of 3 selected

Featured — quick add

What you're comparing

You have 2 listings in the compare tray: Schwab International Index (SWISX) (International index fund) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) (S&P 500 index fund). Below, each row shows the attribute, what it measures, and which listing leads when the value can be ranked numerically.

Schwab International Index (SWISX)

International index fund

Top ratedFidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX)

S&P 500 index fund

Rating 4.5 (130) 4.8 (280)
Expense ratio
(lower is better)
The fee floor for index investing now sits near 0.00%–0.04% — anything materially higher needs a reason.
0.06%0.015%
Index tracked
The benchmark the fund mirrors — methodology decides which stocks make it in and at what weight.
MSCI EAFES&P 500
Minimum
(lower is better)
Initial investment required to open the fund — $0 at Fidelity, $3,000 typical at Vanguard Admiral.
$0$0
Type
Mutual fund vs ETF wrapper changes tax efficiency, intra-day liquidity and minimums.
Mutual fundMutual fund
RegulationSEC, Investment Company Act 1940SEC, Investment Company Act 1940
Pros
  • + Ultra-low cost
  • + Diversification baked in
  • + Beats most active funds over long horizons
  • + Ultra-low cost
  • + Diversification baked in
  • + Beats most active funds over long horizons
Cons
  • Cannot outperform the benchmark
  • Mutual-fund versions price only at end-of-day
  • Minimum-investment requirements at some providers
  • Cannot outperform the benchmark
  • Mutual-fund versions price only at end-of-day
  • Minimum-investment requirements at some providers
HeadquartersWestlake, TX, United StatesBoston, MA, United States
Founded19972011
License
Experience levelBeginnerBeginner
Visit

Bottom line

Across the attributes that can be ranked numerically: Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) leads on expense ratio (0.015%); Schwab International Index (SWISX) leads on minimum ($0). Use this as a starting point — your own situation (account type, deposit size, jurisdiction) decides which of those leads actually matters.

How to use this comparison

Side-by-side comparisons make trade-offs visible — but only if you compare on the dimensions that actually drive the decision. A 0.10% expense-ratio difference between two near-identical broad-market ETFs is real, but rarely the deciding factor for a $5,000 investment. A 5-year track record difference between two robo-advisors usually matters less than whether they support the account type you need.

Before you commit to one option, write down two or three deal-breakers. Maybe it's "must support a SEP IRA". Maybe it's "must have a no-fee checking account included". Filter against those first, then look at marginal differences.

Where possible, every numeric attribute in the table is sourced from the business's own disclosures or a regulator filing. We refresh claimed and verified listings on at least a quarterly cycle; unclaimed listings rely on our last editor review, and we mark the date so you can judge how recent the information is.

Frequently asked questions

Related MoneyMoodBoard guides